October 3, 2017

Required Minimum Distributions

October 3, 2017

As we approach the end of the calendar year, it is important to be reminded about one frequently overlooked retirement plan requirement. Upon attainment of age 70-1/2, certain participants of a tax-qualified retirement plan may be required by federal tax law to withdraw a minimum amount from such plan each year. These mandatory distributions are known as “required minimum distributions” (“RMD(s)”).

May 8, 2017

The Problem with Using Forfeitures to Satisfy Employer Contributions

May 8, 2017

Many tax-qualified, defined contribution retirement plans have provisions that allow the sponsor of such plan to fund profit sharing or, in the case of a 401(k) plan, matching contributions for the benefit of its participants. As a condition of receiving these employer contributions, many sponsors also impose a vesting schedule on such amounts. This has the effect of permissibly forcing a participant to work for some minimum period of time before he or she has a full and non-forfeitable right to such amounts. If a participant fails to satisfy this minimum period of employment, he or she may forfeit some or all of his or her employer funded benefit. When “forfeitures” occur, they are then generally available to the sponsor for the purpose of funding additional employer contributions to the participants of such plan or paying certain plan related administrative expenses. The remainder of this article discusses a newly proposed Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) rule that brings a welcome expansion to the permissible uses of forfeitures to fund employer contributions.

October 28, 2016

The Power of Combining Plans

October 28, 2016

The design of a retirement plan drastically affects both who benefits under the plan as well as the value of the benefit received by those who do participate in the plan. If your goal is to maximize the retirement benefits provided through qualified plans sponsored by your company as well as to potentially skew benefits in favor of a specific group of employees or give disparate benefits to different groups of employees, a plan design that should be considered is to combine a 401(k)/Profit Sharing plan with a Cash Balance Plan. Although this design results in the creation of two distinct plans that each require separate administration, testing and plan documents; it also provides an opportunity to maximize the benefits provided under both plans.